<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Brickblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brickblog.net/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brickblog.net</link>
	<description>Brick blog, intended about Lego, but wound up everything else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:33:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5610 Builder by 7567 Travler &#124; Brickblog</title>
		<link>http://brickblog.net/2012/01/06/5610-builder/comment-page-1#comment-4553</link>
		<dc:creator>7567 Travler &#124; Brickblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brickblog.net/?p=930#comment-4553</guid>
		<description>[...] Post navigation &#8592; Previous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post navigation &larr; Previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7050 Alien Defender by 7049 Alien Striker &#124; Brickblog</title>
		<link>http://brickblog.net/2012/01/04/7050-alien-defender/comment-page-1#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>7049 Alien Striker &#124; Brickblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brickblog.net/?p=925#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>[...] Post navigation &#8592; Previous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post navigation &larr; Previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manfrotto 055XPROB &amp; Giottos MH 7001-621: A dynamic duo for sure by Top 10 for 2011 &#124; Brickblog</title>
		<link>http://brickblog.net/2008/01/27/manfrotto-055xprob-giottos-mh-7001-621-a-dynamic-duo-for-sure/comment-page-1#comment-4551</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 for 2011 &#124; Brickblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brickblog.net/2008/01/27/manfrotto-055xprob-giottos-mh-7001-621-a-dynamic-duo-for-sure#comment-4551</guid>
		<description>[...] Manfrotto 055XPROB &amp; Giottos MH 7001-621: A dynamic duo for sure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Manfrotto 055XPROB &amp; Giottos MH 7001-621: A dynamic duo for sure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. by Top 10 for 2011 &#124; Brickblog</title>
		<link>http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4550</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 for 2011 &#124; Brickblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4550</guid>
		<description>[...] Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cleaning Lego Updated by Cleaning Lego &#124; Brickblog</title>
		<link>http://brickblog.net/2011/12/08/cleaning-lego-updated/comment-page-1#comment-4549</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleaning Lego &#124; Brickblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brickblog.net/?p=657#comment-4549</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: Cleaning Lego Updated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: Cleaning Lego Updated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cleaning Lego by Brickblog &#187; Cleaning Lego Updated</title>
		<link>http://brickblog.net/2006/10/30/cleaning-lego/comment-page-1#comment-4509</link>
		<dc:creator>Brickblog &#187; Cleaning Lego Updated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brickblog.net/?p=10#comment-4509</guid>
		<description>[...] A while back I wrote an article on cleaning lego. The photos are since gone so I&#8217;m republishing it with updated media. The outdated article http://brickblog.net/2006/10/30/cleaning-lego. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A while back I wrote an article on cleaning lego. The photos are since gone so I&#8217;m republishing it with updated media. The outdated article <a href="http://brickblog.net/2006/10/30/cleaning-lego" rel="nofollow">http://brickblog.net/2006/10/30/cleaning-lego</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asymetrical Fighter &#8211; Now in VR! by Block Toys</title>
		<link>http://brickblog.net/2011/09/17/asymetrical-fighter-now-in-vr/comment-page-1#comment-4508</link>
		<dc:creator>Block Toys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brickblog.net/?p=641#comment-4508</guid>
		<description>Nice star wars lookalike. Would be even nicer if there were more photos or pan/tilt action :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice star wars lookalike. Would be even nicer if there were more photos or pan/tilt action :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. by kayakermanmike</title>
		<link>http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4507</link>
		<dc:creator>kayakermanmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4507</guid>
		<description>Jurri,
The good old restart should always be troubleshooting 101. It never worked, but feel free to give it a try. A quick google search indicates Microsoft also recommends a similar approach, though often because the value was not present. .
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/106167

Its worked for a lot of people, and others found info from Microsoft about this too. (post 25)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jurri,<br />
The good old restart should always be troubleshooting 101. It never worked, but feel free to give it a try. A quick google search indicates Microsoft also recommends a similar approach, though often because the value was not present. .<br />
<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/106167" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/106167</a></p>
<p>Its worked for a lot of people, and others found info from Microsoft about this too. (post 25)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. by Jurri</title>
		<link>http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4506</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 07:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4506</guid>
		<description>I have my doubts about this &quot;100% sure&quot; fix. Rationale: no-one seems to know a) what exactly causes this issue b) what the IRPStackSize value actually does on XPSP3.

Has anyone tried restarting the workstation, or just the server service, without touching the registry? I think it&#039;s the restart of the service that really fixes the problem and the registry editing is just waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my doubts about this &#8220;100% sure&#8221; fix. Rationale: no-one seems to know a) what exactly causes this issue b) what the IRPStackSize value actually does on XPSP3.</p>
<p>Has anyone tried restarting the workstation, or just the server service, without touching the registry? I think it&#8217;s the restart of the service that really fixes the problem and the registry editing is just waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Giottos MH-1000 Ballhead by GIOTTOS &#124; Electronics Find</title>
		<link>http://brickblog.net/2009/02/27/giottos-mh-1000-ballhead/comment-page-1#comment-4505</link>
		<dc:creator>GIOTTOS &#124; Electronics Find</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brickblog.net/?p=220#comment-4505</guid>
		<description>[...] brickblog.net   This entry was posted in Uncategorized by admin. Bookmark the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brickblog.net   This entry was posted in Uncategorized by admin. Bookmark the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

