Comments for Brickblog http://brickblog.net Brick blog, intended about Lego, but wound up everything else Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:49:22 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 Comment on Manfrotto 055XPROB & Giottos MH 7001-621: A dynamic duo for sure by kayakermanmike http://brickblog.net/2008/01/27/manfrotto-055xprob-giottos-mh-7001-621-a-dynamic-duo-for-sure/comment-page-1#comment-4471 kayakermanmike Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:49:22 +0000 http://brickblog.net/2008/01/27/manfrotto-055xprob-giottos-mh-7001-621-a-dynamic-duo-for-sure#comment-4471 Hi P Acero, The other thing I've figured out since, is I've turned the mounting plat 90 degrees so it runs along the base of my grip (on my d200) and it clears just fine now. Hi P Acero,

The other thing I’ve figured out since, is I’ve turned the mounting plat 90 degrees so it runs along the base of my grip (on my d200) and it clears just fine now.

]]> Comment on Manfrotto 055XPROB & Giottos MH 7001-621: A dynamic duo for sure by P Acero http://brickblog.net/2008/01/27/manfrotto-055xprob-giottos-mh-7001-621-a-dynamic-duo-for-sure/comment-page-1#comment-4470 P Acero Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:29:06 +0000 http://brickblog.net/2008/01/27/manfrotto-055xprob-giottos-mh-7001-621-a-dynamic-duo-for-sure#comment-4470 Wish I had seen your post earlier to tell you, the problem you had "here is one small drawback to the quick release design. The latch that swings up to tighten the plate, offers little to no clearance with my camera" That is not a problem: pull out the lever handle from the plate, it is spring loaded, and rotate the handle. Both tightening levers have a clutch feature to allow for cameras in the way. Pull out, turn backward, then turn to tighten. It works! Wish I had seen your post earlier to tell you, the problem you had “here is one small drawback to the quick release design. The latch that swings up to tighten the plate, offers little to no clearance with my camera”
That is not a problem: pull out the lever handle from the plate, it is spring loaded, and rotate the handle. Both tightening levers have a clutch feature to allow for cameras in the way. Pull out, turn backward, then turn to tighten. It works!

]]> Comment on The Scorpian Deep-space scout by Jay http://brickblog.net/2010/01/20/the-scorpian-deep-space-scout/comment-page-1#comment-4468 Jay Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:37:43 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=499#comment-4468 Oops, BBCode != HTML. D'oh. Oops, BBCode != HTML.

D’oh.

]]> Comment on The Scorpian Deep-space scout by Jay http://brickblog.net/2010/01/20/the-scorpian-deep-space-scout/comment-page-1#comment-4467 Jay Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:34:41 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=499#comment-4467 It kind of makes sense to develop a backstory, it's sort of that form-follows-function thing, and having a mission sort of dictates what elements a vehicle will have. Unless you have a much more simple goal in mind, like "make a one-man ship that uses the wing panels from the SP3 [s]Vic[/s] Raid [s]Viper[/s] VPR", for instance. :-) It kind of makes sense to develop a backstory, it’s sort of that form-follows-function thing, and having a mission sort of dictates what elements a vehicle will have.

Unless you have a much more simple goal in mind, like “make a one-man ship that uses the wing panels from the SP3 [s]Vic[/s] Raid [s]Viper[/s] VPR”, for instance. :-)

]]> Comment on Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. by Snapshot http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4465 Snapshot Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:47:30 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4465 It's definitely ATIH 2010 that was the culprit in my case. I installed it on one PC and sharing failed after the first reboot. Thanks to the OP for his post. Jonathan It’s definitely ATIH 2010 that was the culprit in my case. I installed it on one PC and sharing failed after the first reboot.

Thanks to the OP for his post.

Jonathan

]]> Comment on Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. by Drew Flechsig http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4464 Drew Flechsig Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:23:30 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4464 Thanks! Your suggested edit of the Registry fixed my problem. I was attempting to share files on my Window XP Media Center (SP3) computer with a PC runnning Vista Home (SP1) and MacBookPro running Mac OSX Version 10.6.2. The Vista Home PC and the MacBook could share files but neither could see the files on the XP Media Center server. I checked the XP server and discovered there was no Registry entry for the "IRPStackSize". On my first attempt to correct the problem I set the value of the IRPStackSize equal to 16 (decimal) and the problem was still present. Then I set the value to 50 (decimal) and the problem was resolved. All three computers are now sharing files. Thanks again for your help. Greatly appreciated. Regards, ...Drew Thanks! Your suggested edit of the Registry fixed my problem. I was attempting to share files on my Window XP Media Center (SP3) computer with a PC runnning Vista Home (SP1) and MacBookPro running Mac OSX Version 10.6.2. The Vista Home PC and the MacBook could share files but neither could see the files on the XP Media Center server. I checked the XP server and discovered there was no Registry entry for the “IRPStackSize”. On my first attempt to correct the problem I set the value of the IRPStackSize equal to 16 (decimal) and the problem was still present. Then I set the value to 50 (decimal) and the problem was resolved. All three computers are now sharing files. Thanks again for your help. Greatly appreciated.

Regards,

…Drew

]]> Comment on Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. by SimonB http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4463 SimonB Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:07:38 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4463 I came across this problem recently when trying to share files between two XP/SP3 machines, and when I had upgraded from Acronis TI Home to ATIH 2010, and also to AVG antivirus s/w. The guy who fixed it reckoned the problem was in AVG, but I've found other sites, notably www.winhlp.com who are convinced the problem is in ATI 2010. Either way, everything is OK with stack size now 18 on both machines, ATI 2010 and Avast successfully installed. God luck! I came across this problem recently when trying to share files between two XP/SP3 machines, and when I had upgraded from Acronis TI Home to ATIH 2010, and also to AVG antivirus s/w.

The guy who fixed it reckoned the problem was in AVG, but I’ve found other sites, notably http://www.winhlp.com who are convinced the problem is in ATI 2010.
Either way, everything is OK with stack size now 18 on both machines, ATI 2010 and Avast successfully installed.

God luck!

]]> Comment on Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. by David http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4462 David Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:14:57 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4462 This was a great fix. I had just completed a fresh install of XP and had never run into network sharing problems before. I don't know why the "not enough storage space" kind of problem showed up, but this regedit fixed the problem. Thanks! This was a great fix. I had just completed a fresh install of XP and had never run into network sharing problems before. I don’t know why the “not enough storage space” kind of problem showed up, but this regedit fixed the problem. Thanks!

]]> Comment on Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. by Cuda http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4461 Cuda Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:47:26 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4461 Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!!! You saved me hours of frustration and I appreciate it. Hopefully I can contribute something to help someone else in the future. Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!!! You saved me hours of frustration and I appreciate it. Hopefully I can contribute something to help someone else in the future.

]]> Comment on Live Free or Die, unless… by chalupa http://brickblog.net/2009/12/01/live-free-or-die-unless/comment-page-1#comment-4460 chalupa Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:46:48 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=494#comment-4460 How about, you can't job through Portsmouth shirtless? http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2009/12/02/for_jogger_no_more_crossing_the_line/?page=1 How about, you can’t job through Portsmouth shirtless?

http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2009/12/02/for_jogger_no_more_crossing_the_line/?page=1

]]>