Comments on: Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post Brick blog, intended about Lego, but wound up everything else Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:33:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Top 10 for 2011 | Brickblog http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4550 Top 10 for 2011 | Brickblog Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:43:03 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4550 [...] Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. [...] [...] Not enough server storage is available to process this command. error. [...]

]]> By: kayakermanmike http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4507 kayakermanmike Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:14:21 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4507 Jurri, The good old restart should always be troubleshooting 101. It never worked, but feel free to give it a try. A quick google search indicates Microsoft also recommends a similar approach, though often because the value was not present. . http://support.microsoft.com/kb/106167 Its worked for a lot of people, and others found info from Microsoft about this too. (post 25) Jurri,
The good old restart should always be troubleshooting 101. It never worked, but feel free to give it a try. A quick google search indicates Microsoft also recommends a similar approach, though often because the value was not present. .
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/106167

Its worked for a lot of people, and others found info from Microsoft about this too. (post 25)

]]> By: Jurri http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4506 Jurri Wed, 05 Oct 2011 07:54:42 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4506 I have my doubts about this "100% sure" fix. Rationale: no-one seems to know a) what exactly causes this issue b) what the IRPStackSize value actually does on XPSP3. Has anyone tried restarting the workstation, or just the server service, without touching the registry? I think it's the restart of the service that really fixes the problem and the registry editing is just waste of everyone's time. I have my doubts about this “100% sure” fix. Rationale: no-one seems to know a) what exactly causes this issue b) what the IRPStackSize value actually does on XPSP3.

Has anyone tried restarting the workstation, or just the server service, without touching the registry? I think it’s the restart of the service that really fixes the problem and the registry editing is just waste of everyone’s time.

]]> By: lacakid http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4496 lacakid Fri, 19 Nov 2010 03:58:58 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4496 YES worked like a champ added the "IRPStackSize" set the value to decimal 50. Went into Services and did a restart of the service named "server"!!! AWESOME it works! Thanks, Tom YES worked like a champ added the “IRPStackSize” set the value to decimal 50. Went into Services and did a restart of the service named “server”!!! AWESOME it works!

Thanks,
Tom

]]> By: kayakermanmike http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4495 kayakermanmike Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:52:56 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4495 Lawrence, it's been a while since I needed to do this, but I believe everyone is referring to the service named "server." Since this server is only dev for my use I had no problem just restarting so I can't say for certain. -Mike Lawrence, it’s been a while since I needed to do this, but I believe everyone is referring to the service named “server.” Since this server is only dev for my use I had no problem just restarting so I can’t say for certain.

-Mike

]]> By: Lawrence http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4494 Lawrence Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:45:10 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4494 You guys mentioned about "Retart server service" which one you guys talking about because there are a lot of server Services. Please let me know so I don't have to reboot the server. You guys mentioned about “Retart server service” which one you guys talking about because there are a lot of server Services.

Please let me know so I don’t have to reboot the server.

]]> By: Lawrence http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4493 Lawrence Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:43:29 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4493 most of you mention "just restart the server service", which one you guys talking about. there are a lot of server service. most of you mention “just restart the server service”, which one you guys talking about. there are a lot of server service.

]]> By: CDog http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4490 CDog Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:44:40 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4490 I have been reading all day about changing this on the server you are connecting FROM. After changing this setting and rebooting my office server (Windows 2003) about 15 times...reconfiguring Symantec antivus...nothing was working. I made the change to the remote computer (Windows XP SP3) and restarted the server service and it connected without issue. Thanks for the info. I have been reading all day about changing this on the server you are connecting FROM. After changing this setting and rebooting my office server (Windows 2003) about 15 times…reconfiguring Symantec antivus…nothing was working. I made the change to the remote computer (Windows XP SP3) and restarted the server service and it connected without issue.

Thanks for the info.

]]> By: Aaron http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4489 Aaron Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:26:22 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4489 worked perfectly with val of 50 on server only and restarted the server process!!! thanks so much. worked perfectly with val of 50 on server only and restarted the server process!!! thanks so much.

]]> By: Prevent data loss with Acronis True Image Home 2010 | TechRepublic Out Loud | TechRepublic.com http://brickblog.net/2009/03/04/not-enough-server-storage-is-available-to-process-this-command%e2%80%9d-error-print-this-post-print-this-post/comment-page-1#comment-4478 Prevent data loss with Acronis True Image Home 2010 | TechRepublic Out Loud | TechRepublic.com Mon, 17 May 2010 13:14:41 +0000 http://brickblog.net/?p=232#comment-4478 [...] has one bug that affects the network, but I found the solution on Brickblog. Simply modify the Registry on all effected computers, and you’re back in [...] [...] has one bug that affects the network, but I found the solution on Brickblog. Simply modify the Registry on all effected computers, and you’re back in [...]

]]>