For this review, I took a few photos for comparison with the D40 and the D70. I set up a tripod roughly 80 inches from our Christmas tree and cycled through the zoom levels on each lens. I set both cameras to auto mode, allowing each camera to take the picture as it wishes, which for both cameras meant automatically popping up their flashes and taking control of aperture and ISO equivalent settings. Because there is currently no way to open the raw NEF files from the D40 in Photoshop, I set both cameras to write jpg files at the “fine” setting. So really, what we have, is the typical user settings. So enough with the talk eh? Lets take a look at the photos.
Because of differences in the lenses, I had to settle for close enough to the same. The zoomed in photos will be at 50mm for the D40 and 55mm for the D70. The other photos are both at 35mm. For the photos, the D40 decided that an ISO equivalent of 400 was good, while the 70 chose to shoot at 200. Both cameras went with 1/60s shutter speeds. Below is the D40 shooting at 35mm, f/4.8.
The next photo is the D70 at the same distance and focal length which ended up shooting at f/4.2
As you can see the exposure is a bit more washed out on the D40, but not enough so that the picture looks bad. The D70 is a bit darker and subsequently you could bring more out in Photoshop, but to snap a pic and dump to print I think the D40 might be the better choice. Lets zoom in and take a look.
The D40 at 50mm f/5.6 still looks pretty good. As does the D70 at 55mm f/4.5(below). The D40 still ends up a little washed out, but I’m not a fan of flash on camera anyway, and will always try to shoot without flash first. If you have to use a flash, diffuse it, or better yet use a flash like the SB-800 so you can reflect it of the ceiling or wall to keep your image from showing signs of harsh shadow and flattening of detail.
The following are cropped from the original size jpegs at 100%. I still needed to re-size them to make them fit in this blog’s framework. It should however, show the detail available from a mere 6.1 megapixels. Again, the D40 followed by the D70, crops taken from the center of the focal area.
Both of these are from the 50/55mm pictures taken roughly 7ft away at night under typical lighting conditions. (That means no strobes, and no extra lighting for these pictures. With just a little more detail you would be able to tell from the two whit stripes on the bottom of the needles that that indeed is a Balsam Fir. These final two are from upper left corners of the image. Note the D40 stays sharp, where the D70 does not. Now this is most likely due to aperture or something, and if I had bothered to manually set stuff it probably wouldn’t happen. However, except for using a tripod for control of distance and subject, I’m shooting these as a general user would.
Now I know it’s hard to tell from 400px wide images, so go get yourself a look at the directories with the original photos. The D40 here and the D70 here. For fun, you can find two photos from Ye Olde Coolpix as well. They are less then impressive.
I uploaded the full-size photos with no resizing in these directories, so make sure when you look at one individually click on the link (3008×2000) to see the full size image. So what does this all add up to? When I printed basic quality jpegs from the D70 (I was shooting in Raw+Basic) I was able to take those basic quality jpgs pop them directly into my father’s Epson r500 and print them up with AMAZING quality. The same should be the case with the 40, but I have not yet had an event worth printing from. My friends in photo say that a 6.1 megapixels should be able to easily print up to 20″ without having to first run any fractal software, and even larger with some processing. So who out there (besides the occasional great shot, or pros) is printing larger then 8×10? If your the average user, forget chasing megapixels and go with a camera that you can afford and spend your hard earned money on more glass and a good flash for your camera. But don’t take it from me, read “The Megapixel Myth” article written by a pro.








Good comparison though a little unfair because D70s is known for poor JGP out of camera. You should try D70s raw to bring out the full potential of D70 and see how it fares against D40 JPG.
Thanks for pointing that out Gary. As I mention, I’m a beginner and approached the subject as a newbie would and used it as-is out of the box. I have since set my D40 to compensate for exposure by under exposing just slightly.
links are dead…